Legal and Case Commentary

Analysis of the court decisions, tribunal rulings and legislative changes that affect veterans and first responders. Written by our expert team, with a focus on what each development means in practice.

Defence Fined Over Psychosocial Hazards: What this Landmark Case Means for Psychosocial Hazards in the Workplace

DVA claims and compensation matters don’t exist in isolation. They sit alongside injury, illness, transition, family pressures and uncertainty about the future. The system is complex, the stakes are personal, and the process can feel overwhelming. At KSC Law, our role is to make it more manageable. Our DVA lawyers support veterans and Defence personnel

Defence Fined Over Psychosocial Hazards: What this Landmark Case Means for Psychosocial Hazards in the Workplace Read More »

Legal and Case Commentary

Elisha v Vision Australia: What the Verdict Could Mean for DVA Claims

In late 2024, the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in Elisha v Vision Australia — a case already described as a landmark shift in Australian employment and compensation law. The case centred on psychiatric injury, and whether an employer could be held responsible for breaching its own workplace policies and procedures during

Elisha v Vision Australia: What the Verdict Could Mean for DVA Claims Read More »

Legal and Case Commentary

What is the 50:50 rule in Queensland, and how does KSC Law’s 91:9 model help veterans keep more?

If you’ve ever wondered what the 50:50 rule in Queensland is, you’re not alone. Most people look it up for one reason: fear of legal fees. The 50:50 rule in Queensland is a legal safety net for you, the client. It limits how much a lawyer can charge you in certain compensation matters, so you’re

What is the 50:50 rule in Queensland, and how does KSC Law’s 91:9 model help veterans keep more? Read More »

Legal and Case Commentary